Connect with us

Global Update

Melinda French Gates Responds to Epstein Revelations, Says Questions Surrounding Bill Gates Are Not Hers to Answer

Published

on

Melinda French Gates has spoken publicly about the renewed attention surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein files.

She says the repeated mentions of her former husband, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, leave her with a deep sense of sadness for the alleged victims and raise unresolved questions she believes others must answer.

In a wide-ranging interview featured on Wild Card With Rachel Martin, Melinda French Gates reflected on what she described as a broader societal reckoning prompted by the ongoing release and scrutiny of documents connected to Epstein, the disgraced financier who died in jail in 2019 while facing federal sex trafficking charges.

“I think we’re having a reckoning as a society,” she said, stressing that no young girl should ever be subjected to the situations associated with Epstein and those within his circle. “No girl should ever be put in the situation that they were put in by Epstein and whatever was going on with all of the various people around him. It’s beyond heartbreaking.”

French Gates said the issue resonates deeply on a personal level, recalling both her own adolescence and the years when her daughters were the same age as some of Epstein’s alleged victims. She explained that reading or hearing new details is emotionally difficult, not only because of the suffering described, but also because it revives memories of what she called “very, very painful times” during her marriage.

While she did not elaborate on specific events, she acknowledged that the resurfacing of Epstein-related news inevitably brings discomfort. “It brings back memories of some very painful times in my marriage,” she said, adding that she has made a conscious effort to move forward with her life.

French Gates, who divorced Bill Gates in 2021 after 27 years of marriage, emphasised that she no longer feels responsible for addressing questions tied to Epstein or to her former husband’s past associations.

“Whatever questions remain there of what I don’t, can’t even begin to know all of it, those questions are for those people and for even my ex-husband,” she said. “They need to answer to those things, not me.”

Her comments come amid renewed public debate following the release and analysis of Epstein-related court documents, often referred to as the “Epstein files,” which list numerous high-profile figures mentioned in testimonies and records. Being named in such documents does not in itself imply wrongdoing, but the disclosures have reignited scrutiny of Epstein’s network and the systems that allowed his abuse to continue for years.

Throughout the interview, French Gates repeatedly returned to the human impact of the revelations, describing her dominant emotional response as “unbelievable sadness.” She said that while she has been able to move on and find happiness in what she described as an “unexpected, beautiful place” in her life, she remains deeply affected by the stories of the women who say they were abused as girls.

“For me, it’s just sadness,” she said. “Sadness for those young girls… how did that happen to those girls?”

French Gates also reflected on the personal cost of distancing herself from what she described as “the muck,” noting that she felt compelled not only to leave her marriage but eventually to step away from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, one of the world’s most influential philanthropic organisations.

Despite the pain, she expressed hope that justice will be achieved for Epstein’s victims, many of whom are now adults speaking publicly about their experiences. Referencing women who have testified or addressed the media in Washington, DC, she said their courage underscores the gravity of what they endured. “What they went through is just unimaginable,” she said.

Her remarks add a rare, personal perspective to the ongoing global conversation about accountability, power, and the long-term consequences of abuse, as survivors continue to seek recognition and justice.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Global Update

China Finds Stable Home in Ghana: Cultural Celebrations Signal Deepening Ties

Published

on

The Chinese community in Ghana, joined by Ghanaian friends and officials, celebrated the Lantern Festival with a vibrant gala at the forecourt of Ghana’s Parliament House in Accra, highlighting the growing cultural integration and strong bilateral relations between the two nations.

The event, held on Sunday, June 21, 2026, ahead of the Lantern Festival on Tuesday, featured captivating performances by the Anhui Performing Arts Group and other cultural troupes, showcasing traditional Chinese dance and music.

People visit a food bazaar during an event in celebration of the Chinese Lantern Festival at the forecourt of Ghana’s Parliament House in Accra, Ghana, March 1, 2026. (Photo by Seth/Xinhua)

A food bazaar offering authentic Chinese delicacies set a festive tone, drawing both Chinese residents and local guests. The celebration underscored the sense of community and belonging among Chinese nationals living in Ghana.

Addressing the gathering, Li Yang, Chargé d’Affaires a.i. of the Chinese Embassy in Ghana, stressed the significance of the Lantern Festival as a symbol of reunion, prosperity, and peace.

He noted that 2026 marks the 66th anniversary of diplomatic relations between China and Ghana, as well as the 70th anniversary of China-Africa diplomatic ties.

Li reaffirmed China’s commitment to deepening cooperation with Ghana and Africa through initiatives such as the China-Africa Year of People-to-People Exchanges and the Initiative on Cooperation Supporting Modernization in Africa.

Chinese artists perform Huangmei Opera during an event in celebration of the Chinese Lantern Festival at the forecourt of Ghana’s Parliament House in Accra, Ghana, March 1, 2026.
(Photo by Seth/Xinhua)

Ghanaian officials expressed similar warmth. Food and Agriculture Minister Eric Opoku welcomed Chinese investors to partner in Ghana’s agricultural transformation, citing opportunities in irrigation, farm mechanization, agro-processing, and industrial zones.

Deputy Defence Minister Ernest Brogya Genfi conveyed President John Dramani Mahama’s greetings and praised the Chinese community for their substantial contributions to Ghana’s economy through investments in manufacturing, commerce, and hospitality.

The high-profile celebration at Parliament House reflects the stable and increasingly rooted presence of the Chinese community in Ghana, serving as a testament to the maturing strategic partnership between the two countries.

Continue Reading

Global Update

What Happens Next After Keir Starmer’s Resignation? A Timeline for Britain’s New PM

Published

on

Sir Keir Starmer has announced he will step down as Britain’s Prime Minister, triggering a Labour Party leadership contest that could see a new leader in place by September – or potentially much sooner.

The Prime Minister’s resignation, delivered at a media conference on Monday, June 22, 2026, sets in motion a carefully choreographed process governed by Labour Party rules. While Starmer will remain in office during the transition, the coming weeks will determine who succeeds him at 10 Downing Street.

Here is what happens next, step by step, according to ABC’s Chief Elections and Data Analyst Casey Briggs and former Europe correspondent Barbara Miller.

1. Starmer stays until September – but not necessarily

Starmer has confirmed he will not step down immediately. He is expected to remain as Prime Minister until a successor is chosen, with the transition period stretching potentially into September.

“He’s probably going to stay there until September, but there will be a contest now for the new leader. And while they sort that out, he will remain there as PM,” Briggs explained.

However, Briggs clarified that the September date is not fixed; it applies only if a contested ballot is required.

2. Nominations open on 9 July, after the NATO summit

Starmer has indicated he will ask the executive committee of the Labour Party to open nominations on 9 July 2026.

That date is strategically chosen: it falls the day after the NATO summit in Turkey, which Starmer is expected to attend. His final international appearance as PM will therefore be on the world stage alongside other allied leaders.

3. Nominations close by 23 July (summer recess)

Once nominations open, candidates will have a narrow window to secure support. Starmer has said he will ask for nominations to be closed by the time of Parliament’s summer recess.

According to Briggs, that date is 23 July 2026 – though he noted it is not a fixed statutory date but the likely parliamentary timetable.

“Somewhere between the 9th and 23rd of July, we’ll expect nominations to be closed,” Briggs said.

4. A candidate needs 81 MP signatures to get on the ballot

To become a leadership contender, a Labour MP must secure 81 signatures from fellow Labour MPs – a significant threshold that effectively limits the field to candidates with substantial parliamentary backing.

Briggs highlighted this as a crucial gatekeeping mechanism:

“To get on the ballot, an MP needs 81 signatures of their fellow MPs to get on the ballot.”

5. If only one candidate emerges – new PM by mid-to-late July

If only one candidate secures the required 81 nominations, there will be no contest. That candidate will automatically become Labour Party leader and can be sworn in as Prime Minister without a membership ballot.

“If there is only one candidate at that point, that person will take over and become leader of the Labour Party and can be sworn in,” Briggs confirmed.

In that scenario, Britain could have a new Prime Minister by mid-to-late July – well before the summer recess ends.

6. If multiple candidates stand – ballot runs to late August

If two or more candidates qualify, the contest will go to a ballot of all Labour Party members. That process will take several weeks, with voting likely running through August.

“If there is more than one candidate, then that will go to a ballot of Labour Party members and that will take through to potentially late August,” Briggs said.

7. New PM in place by 1 September – when Parliament returns

The ultimate deadline is the resumption of Parliament in September. Briggs noted that the new leader – whether chosen by acclamation or by membership ballot – is expected to be in office by the time of the September sittings, which begin on 1 September.

“The new PM can be in office by the time of the September sittings, which is September 1,” he said.

Who is in the running? Andy Burnham vs Wes Streeting

All indications point to Andy Burnham, the Mayor of Greater Manchester, as the clear frontrunner. Briggs observed that Burnham is “hugely popular” within the Labour Party, and there is palpable excitement about his potential return to Westminster.

But he may not be unopposed.

Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary and a prominent Starmerite, is still considering whether to stand. Barbara Miller suggested Streeting might opt for a deal with Burnham rather than a divisive contest.

“There is a suggestion that he might be considering whether it would be better not to stand and to perhaps do some kind of deal with Andy Burnham where he gets a good position in Burnham’s cabinet,” Miller said.

Other potential contenders mentioned include Angela Rayner, the former Deputy Prime Minister, and Al Carnes, a junior defence minister who resigned recently.

Miller noted that while Starmerite candidates could theoretically run as a “surrogate” to continue Starmer’s legacy, “the names are not particularly prominent.”

What to watch

The key dates to watch are 9 July (nominations open), 23 July (nominations close), and 1 September (Parliament returns). If Burnham secures the required 81 signatures and no other candidate qualifies, Britain could have a new Prime Minister within weeks. If Streeting or others enter the race, the contest will stretch into late August – with Labour members deciding the country’s next leader.

Continue Reading

Global Update

‘Devastating Consequences’: Trump Drawing up Plans to Massively Disrupt International travel to the U.S.

Published

on

The Trump administration is drawing up plans to massively disrupt international travel to the United States by halting customs and immigration processing at major airports in so-called “sanctuary cities,” a move that could throw the global aviation industry into chaos just months before the FIFA World Cup.

According to new reporting confirmed by Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, the proposal would effectively end Customs and Border Protection (CBP) processing for cargo and international travelers at key hubs, including Los Angeles (LAX), New York (JFK & Newark), Chicago (O’Hare), Seattle, Philadelphia, Boston, San Francisco, and Denver.

Speaking on Fox News’ The Sean Hannity Show on Tuesday, Secretary Mullin said the plans are currently being drawn up but are not final. He argued that federal authorities “shouldn’t be processing international flights into cities where local Democratic leaders refuse to cooperate with White House immigration enforcement.

“Local radical left Democrats aren’t allowing us to do our job and enforce federal laws,” Mullin said.

What is a ‘Sanctuary City’?

The term refers to jurisdictions that limit their cooperation with federal immigration crackdowns. The Trump administration has previously published a list of cities and states it claims “impede enforcement of federal immigration laws,” most run by Democrats. The standoff has already led to a temporary shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) earlier this year before a funding bill was signed in late April.

Travel Industry in Uproar

If implemented, the plan would make it significantly harder to find direct international flights into these major metropolitan areas. Travelers flying into Newark or Philadelphia, for example, might be forced to land in Washington D.C., Baltimore, or Dallas and then drive for hours to their destinations.

The US Travel Association and major airlines have condemned the proposal. In a statement, the association warned that such a move would have “devastating consequences for the travel industry and communities that depend on international visitation.”

Airlines for America echoed the sentiment, stating that “reducing CBP staffing at major airports would have a devastating effect… causing a significant operational disruption to carriers, travelers and the flow of international cargo.”

Internal White House Opposition

Notably, opposition has also come from within the Trump administration itself. Transport Secretary Sean Duffy told a congressional hearing last week that restricting travel based on politics is “a bad idea.”

“We have people from around the world and around the country that need to be able to fly into all different kinds of places,” Duffy said. “We shouldn’t shut down air travel in a state that doesn’t agree with our politics.”

World Cup Warning

The proposed disruption comes as millions of foreign tourists are expected to travel to the United States for the FIFA World Cup, which begins in June. Industry experts warn that curbing international arrivals at the country’s busiest gateways would gridlock remaining ports of entry and damage America’s reputation as a travel destination.

As of Wednesday, the White House has not issued a final decision.

Information from Reuters and DW.com contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Trending