Connect with us

Business

Trump Moves to Block U.S. States From Regulating AI, Triggering Global Concern

Published

on

Image by DC Studio on Freepik. Insert: Donald Trump

President Donald Trump says he will sign an executive order barring U.S. states from creating or enforcing their own artificial intelligence regulations.

The sweeping move would centralize AI rule-making in Washington and sharply curb state-level oversight.

The announcement, made Monday, December 8, 2025, on Trump’s Truth Social account, immediately intensified a national and global debate over who should police AI technologies that now shape everything from healthcare decisions and hiring processes to policing tools and children’s online experiences.

“There must be only ONE Rulebook if we are going to continue to lead in AI,” Trump wrote. “We are beating ALL COUNTRIES… but that won’t last long if we are going to have 50 States… involved in RULES and the APPROVAL PROCESS.”

The order would empower the federal government to challenge and override existing state laws on AI safety, algorithmic discrimination, and deepfakes — including legislation passed by Democrats and Republicans alike.

State Laws in Trouble as White House Pushes National Power

The draft order directs the U.S. attorney general to establish an AI Litigation Task Force tasked with striking down state-level rules and replacing them with Trump’s more relaxed federal framework, according to documents reviewed by CNN.

The move aligns closely with Silicon Valley giants, including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who have complained that navigating a patchwork of state laws threatens innovation and America’s competitiveness in the global AI race.

But the proposal has provoked fierce resistance from academics, safety groups, tech workers, and state lawmakers who argue that states have filled a void left by Congress — and that removing them from the equation will expose consumers, workers, and children to increased risk.

A New Battle in America’s AI War

Artificial intelligence remains lightly regulated in the United States. In the absence of sweeping federal laws, several states — including California, Colorado, and Illinois — have passed rules targeting issues such as:

  • Algorithmic bias in hiring
  • AI-generated deepfakes and misinformation
  • Child protection and exposure to sexualized content
  • Data privacy and surveillance practices

Those efforts may soon be wiped away.

Trump’s order argues that uniform national rules are essential to “enhance America’s global AI dominance.” Critics say it’s a blueprint for industry self-governance.

Pushback From Both Sides of the Political Spectrum

Opposition has been widespread — and unusually bipartisan.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis blasted the plan last month, calling it “federal government overreach.”

“Stripping states of jurisdiction to regulate AI is a subsidy to Big Tech,” DeSantis said, warning that states would lose the ability to protect citizens from political censorship, child-targeted harms, intellectual property violations, and energy-draining data centers.

Hundreds of organizations — including labor unions, tech worker groups, university researchers, consumer safety nonprofits, and child-protection advocates — have sent letters to Congress urging lawmakers to stop the White House plan.

Sacha Haworth, Executive Director of The Tech Oversight Project, warned that the move could cement corporate control over the future of AI.

“We’re in a fight to determine who will benefit from AI: Big Tech CEOs or the American people,” Haworth said. “We cannot afford a decade with Big Tech in the driver’s seat.”

Trump Administration Already Seeking Workarounds

Congress previously blocked an attempt by Republicans to ban state AI regulation, voting overwhelmingly to remove a 10-year moratorium buried inside a Trump-backed domestic policy bill.

But the administration has continued pushing in other ways, including a Silicon Valley-friendly AI plan released weeks later, emphasizing deregulation as key to national competitiveness.

National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said Monday that Trump had reviewed “something close to a final” version of the executive order.

“Some states want to regulate these companies within an inch of their lives,” Hassett told CNBC. “This executive order… is going to make it clear that there’s one set of rules for AI companies in the U.S.”

Global Stakes for a Global Technology

Trump’s move is expected to resonate far beyond U.S. borders. With China, the European Union, and African nations developing their own AI regimes, the question of how the U.S. regulates — or fails to regulate — the technology has become a global concern.

For countries like Ghana and others across Africa increasingly adopting AI tools in medicine, education, and governance, America’s decision could push innovation forward — or export under-regulated technologies with potential risks.

Business

Why Many Diaspora Investors Lose Money in Ghana — And End Up Leaving

Published

on

Image by freepik

A growing number of diaspora returnees hoping to invest or start businesses in Ghana are losing significant sums of money.

This often forces them to abandon their ventures and return abroad, according to insights shared by a long-term resident and entrepreneur familiar with Ghana’s business landscape.

In a widely circulated video by entrepreneurship podcaster Derrick Abaitey, he discusses diaspora investment failures and argues that enthusiasm alone — without local knowledge — is one of the biggest reasons many foreign-based Africans struggle when they attempt to do business in Ghana and across Africa.

“Most of the people who lose money are from the diaspora,” he said, explaining that many returnees are inspired by business ideas that work well in Europe or North America and assume those same models will succeed back home. “They get excited about ideas abroad and think, ‘This will work perfectly in my country,’ but that’s not how it works.”

According to the speaker, a key problem is that many diaspora investors were not entrepreneurs in their countries of residence before attempting to launch businesses in Ghana. Without prior experience running a venture, they often underestimate the complexity of local markets and overestimate demand for imported business concepts.

He also stressed that lack of research and cultural understanding plays a major role in business failures.

“They don’t take time to understand whether the business will actually work here,” he said. “You have to understand the people — their buying patterns, their decision-making process, and how they spend money.”

Drawing from personal experience, the entrepreneur revealed that his first business in East Legon failed, resulting in losses of about US$40,000, largely due to the same assumptions he now warns others against. “I came with the wrong mindset,” he admitted. “Later, when I truly understood the people, the decisions I made changed everything for our business.”

One practical example highlighted was Ghana’s payment culture. Despite the rise of digital finance, the speaker noted that about 80 percent of transactions in Ghana are conducted via mobile money, not bank cards. Businesses that rely solely on card payments risk excluding the majority of potential customers.

“If you come in and start a business that only accepts card payments, you will lose out on 80 percent of transactions,” he warned, adding that his own business faced this challenge firsthand.

The broader lesson, he said, is that Ghana’s market operates within a distinct cultural and economic context that requires patience, observation, and adaptation.

“We have a culture here. We have a way of doing things here,” he stated.

For members of the diaspora considering investing or relocating to Ghana, the message is clear: success depends less on importing ideas and more on understanding local realities. Without that grounding, even well-funded ventures can fail — leaving investors disillusioned and financially strained.

Ghana continues to attract global interest from Africans abroad seeking reconnection and opportunity, and this expert says sustainable success will require deeper engagement with local communities, consumer behaviour, and business norms — not just optimism and capital.

Continue Reading

Business

Cost of Living in Accra: Real Numbers From a Family Raising Children in Ghana

Published

on

A growing number of families in the United States, the UK and across Europe are exploring life in Ghana—whether for relocation, return, or long-term stays. One of the biggest questions they face is simple but critical: How much does it really cost to live in Accra?

In a detailed YouTube video titled “Cost of Living in Accra Ghana | Family Expenses, Schools, Utilities & Daily Life,” content creator Malaika in GH offers a firsthand breakdown of monthly and annual expenses based on her family’s real-life experience after more than a year living in Ghana with two young children.

Unlike curated relocation guides, the video focuses on actual costs—covering housing, education, food, healthcare, utilities, childcare and leisure—providing valuable insight for families comparing Ghana with life in the US, UK or Europe.

Housing: The Biggest Adjustment

Housing remains one of the most significant financial and cultural adjustments for newcomers. Unlike Western systems that allow monthly rent payments, many landlords in Ghana require one to two years’ rent paid upfront.

For a family seeking a decent three-bedroom home in a good Accra neighborhood, Malaika estimates monthly rent at around GH¢10,000 (approximately $650 USD). In premium areas such as Airport or Cantonments, rents can rise to $3,000 USD per month, paid in advance for the full year.

She also notes that many homes come unfurnished, meaning additional costs for appliances such as cookers, refrigerators, and sometimes generators.

To ease the transition, she strongly advises Ghanaians in the diaspora to explore staying temporarily with family or renting family-owned properties at reduced rates—an option that helped her family manage costs while settling in.

Education: Wide Range, Strong Standards

School fees in Ghana vary widely depending on the type of institution. Community schools can cost as little as GH¢4,000 per year, while top-tier international schools may charge between $4,000 and $6,000 USD annually.

Her older child attends a British Cambridge curriculum school and is thriving academically. She cautions parents to carefully verify schools that market themselves as “international,” noting that quality varies.

Daycare, however, is significantly more affordable than in the UK or US. Her younger child’s daycare costs about £400 per term, a fraction of what many parents pay in Western countries.

Food and Household Shopping

Weekly grocery shopping at supermarkets such as Melcom typically costs GH¢350 to GH¢600, depending on household needs. Local markets provide fresh produce like plantain, cassava, yams and vegetables at lower prices, often under GH¢200 per visit.

Wholesale shopping outlets also help families cut costs, especially for children’s items such as juice packs and snacks.

Healthcare: Affordable but Planning Is Key

Healthcare costs are generally manageable, especially for families without chronic medical needs. At the University of Ghana Medical Centre, registration costs are modest, and doctor consultations average around GH¢200, with medication and tests adding extra costs.

Private facilities such as Bloom Hospital offer faster service but at higher rates—up to GH¢300 per consultation. Malaika advises families to obtain health insurance or maintain a dedicated medical savings fund, particularly for emergencies.

Utilities, Help and Transport

For families, domestic help is common and culturally accepted in Ghana. Monthly house help wages typically range from GH¢800 to GH¢1,500.

Other recurring costs include:

  • Electricity: GH¢1,500–GH¢3,000 per month
  • Driver: About GH¢1,500 per month
  • Fuel: GH¢500–GH¢800 per month

Family Life and Leisure

Entertainment for children is widely available and relatively affordable. Indoor play centers charge between GH¢70 and GH¢300 per child, while outdoor options like Aburi Botanical Gardens allow families to spend a full day for around GH¢100.

Cinema tickets average about GH¢100, with occasional promotions offering free entry for children.

A Growing Appeal for Families Abroad

Malaika concludes that despite the upfront costs—particularly housing and school fees—life in Ghana offers strong value, community support, affordable childcare, and a family-friendly environment. For her family, relocating to Ghana has been a positive and life-changing decision.

As more families in the diaspora consider returning or relocating, a firsthand account like this one provides a realistic picture of what living in Accra truly costs—without hype or exaggeration.

Continue Reading

Business

Ghana’s Lithium Find: Think tank IMANI Raises Red Flags as Parliament Weighs Ewoyaa Mining Deal

Published

on

As Ghana positions itself to enter the global lithium supply chain, a fresh policy debate has emerged over whether the country is negotiating the strongest possible fiscal terms for one of its most strategically important mineral projects.

Franklin Cudjoe, founding president of policy think tank IMANI Africa, has questioned key assumptions underpinning the government’s proposed royalty framework for lithium, warning that inaccurate pricing data could undermine Ghana’s long-term national interest.

In a detailed commentary, Cudjoe clarified that under the proposed sliding royalty regime for lithium, the starting royalty rate remains 5 percent, not 7 percent as previously suggested in public discourse.

Crucially, he noted that the 5 percent rate would apply until lithium prices exceed $1,500 per tonne, despite current global prices hovering around $1,200 per ton.

“At today’s prices, with production costs estimated at $610 per tonne, the investor enjoys a profit margin of nearly 45 percent,” Cudjoe argued.

He contrasted this with conditions in 2024, when the same investor was prepared to sign an agreement with a 10 percent royalty rate while earning less than a 20 percent margin, based on an average price of $800 per tonne.

Cudjoe also challenged figures cited by the Minister of Lands and Natural Resources, saying claims that a 5 percent starting royalty was based on lithium prices of $3,000 per tonne in 2024 were “inaccurate.”

He urged government decision-makers to ensure that negotiations are anchored in verifiable market data rather than projections that could weaken Ghana’s bargaining position.

His comments come as Parliament considers a revised Mining Lease for the Ewoyaa Lithium Project in Ghana’s Central Region, led by Atlantic Lithium Limited. The lease has been referred to Parliament’s Select Committee, marking a critical step toward ratification and the possible development of Ghana’s first lithium mine.

Lithium’s role as a core input for electric vehicle batteries and renewable energy storage has elevated Ewoyaa’s importance beyond traditional mining considerations. Policymakers increasingly see the project as a pathway for Ghana to diversify away from gold and align itself with the fast-growing global clean energy economy.

To support this transition, the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources has submitted the Minerals and Mining (Royalty) Regulations, 2025, which introduce a sliding royalty scale linked to global spodumene prices.

According to Graphic Business, the framework proposes royalties ranging from 5 percent for prices up to $1,500 per ton to 12 percent when prices exceed $3,000 per tonne, while keeping other fiscal terms from the original 2023 lease unchanged.

Government officials say the approach balances national revenue interests with the need to maintain Ghana’s competitiveness as an investment destination. Atlantic Lithium, for its part, has expressed optimism that parliamentary ratification would unlock development, attract foreign direct investment, and stimulate local economic activity.

Still, analysts say the debate highlights a broader challenge facing resource-rich countries: how to secure fair value from critical minerals at a time of accelerating global demand, without discouraging investment.

Cudjoe pointed to President John Dramani Mahama’s public engagement on lithium policy as a signal of the issue’s national importance, urging the minister to ensure that all decisions are transparent, consultative, and data-driven, in line with presidential direction.

As Parliament prepares to review the lease after its festive recess, the outcome is likely to shape not only the Ewoyaa project but Ghana’s broader reputation in the global critical minerals race.

Continue Reading

Trending