Connect with us

Global Update

Trump Cancels Greenland Tariff Threat, Cites NATO ‘Framework’ for Future Arctic Deal

Published

on

U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday, January 20, 2026, abruptly canceled a threatened round of tariffs against European allies after announcing that he and NATO leaders had agreed to a “framework of a future deal” focused on Arctic security.

The announcement eases — at least temporarily — a brewing transatlantic crisis over Greenland.

Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Trump said the decision to back off proposed tariffs targeting Denmark and other NATO members followed discussions on Arctic cooperation.

Earlier in the day, he had reiterated his controversial claim that the United States should ultimately gain control of Greenland, a semi-autonomous Danish territory, arguing that it is strategically vital to counter Russian and Chinese activity in the Arctic.

The reversal came just hours after Trump declared that he wanted “right, title and ownership” of Greenland, while insisting he would not use military force to obtain it. His remarks had rattled European capitals and raised fears of a serious rupture within NATO, one of the world’s most enduring military alliances.

“We probably won’t get anything unless I decide to use excessive strength and force — where we would be frankly unstoppable,” Trump said during his Davos address, before adding, “But I won’t do that. I don’t want to use force.”

NATO Tensions and Arctic Stakes

Trump described his demand for Greenland as a modest request in light of what he described as decades of U.S. security guarantees for Europe, particularly during World War II and throughout the Cold War. He argued that Washington needs greater control in the Arctic to ensure global security, despite the United States already operating a major military base on the island.

NATO officials have repeatedly stressed that Greenland is not for sale and remains under Danish sovereignty. Denmark, a founding NATO member, has maintained that any discussion of Arctic security must respect its territorial integrity.

Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen welcomed Trump’s assurance that military force was “not on the table,” but criticized the broader tone of the speech. “This way of thinking about territorial integrity does not match the institutions we have,” he said, underscoring that both Denmark and Greenland are part of NATO.

A Danish government official, speaking anonymously, confirmed that Copenhagen is open to talks on U.S. security concerns but emphasized that Denmark’s sovereignty over Greenland remains a red line.

Greenland Reacts

In Greenland itself, Trump’s rhetoric has prompted unease. Authorities recently issued a public crisis-preparedness handbook advising residents to stockpile essentials such as food, water and fuel for at least five days.

“We just went to the grocery store and bought supplies,” said Tony Jakobsen, a resident of Nuuk, Greenland’s capital. “It’s better to be ready than not ready.”

Others reacted more sharply. Johnny Hedemann, another Nuuk resident, described Trump’s comments as “insulting,” accusing the U.S. president of reducing Greenland and its people to “just an ice cube.”

“Living in this nature, you have to be prepared for almost anything,” Hedemann said. “And now there’s another threat — and that’s Trump.”

Tariffs Paused, Uncertainty Remains

Before Wednesday’s announcement, Trump had threatened to impose tariffs starting at 10% and rising to 25% by mid-year on imports from Denmark and several other European allies unless they negotiated over Greenland’s future. European leaders warned that such measures would provoke a unified and proportional response from the European Union.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the United Kingdom would not “yield on our principles and values” regarding Greenland under tariff threats, while European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen cautioned that any U.S. trade action would be met firmly.

Economists had warned that a tariff escalation could destabilize the fragile U.S.–EU trade truce reached last year. Although global markets initially wobbled on Trump’s Greenland remarks, U.S. stocks recovered later on Wednesday following news of the tariff cancellation.

Davos Speech Overshadowed

Trump’s Davos appearance was originally billed as a platform to outline his plans to address rising housing costs in the United States — a key domestic issue ahead of November’s midterm elections. Instead, Greenland dominated the discussion, with the president sharply criticizing Denmark and repeatedly suggesting that Europe’s economy is weakening while the U.S. continues to boom.

“We want strong allies, not seriously weakened ones,” Trump said, claiming European economies tend to “follow us down, and you follow us up.”

Despite the dramatic rhetoric, Trump later reiterated to reporters that the United States would not invade Greenland. “Military is not on the table,” he said, adding that negotiations would rely on “better judgment.”

For now, the announced NATO framework appears to have cooled immediate tensions. Yet Trump’s insistence that the United States “will remember” Europe’s response leaves open the possibility that Greenland — and the Arctic’s growing geopolitical importance — could again become a flashpoint in U.S.-European relations.

Global Update

Newspaper Headlines Today: Tuesday, January 20, 2026

Published

on

Here are today’s front pages from some of Ghana’s major newspapers.

Continue Reading

Global Update

International Petition Calls for Boycott of 2026 FIFA World Cup If Trump Annexes Greenland

Published

on

An online petition launched in the Netherlands is urging a boycott of the 2026 FIFA World Cup should the United States proceed with plans to annex Greenland.

The campaign, which is gaining traction worldwide, reflects rising international concern over geopolitical tensions involving the strategic Arctic territory.

The petition, hosted on Petities.nl by activist Rob Wilstra, calls on the Royal Dutch Football Association (KNVB) to formally communicate to FIFA and the Trump administration that the Netherlands should withdraw from the tournament if Greenland is taken over — linking global sport with international law and democratic principles.

The initiative argues that the competition — hosted by the U.S. — should not confer legitimacy on an administration seen as undermining the international legal order, especially if it follows through on remarks by U.S. President Donald Trump about acquiring Greenland for strategic and resource interests.

Although in its early stages, the petition has drawn attention within European civic circles amid broader protests against U.S. statements about Greenland’s future. Recent demonstrations in Denmark — where thousands rallied under slogans like “Greenland is not for sale” to support the island’s self-determination — highlight growing pushback against perceived American overreach in Arctic affairs.

Supporters of the petition stress that sport should be a unifying force, not a vehicle for normalizing aggressive geopolitical moves. They say a boycott would send a symbolic message that democracies should uphold international law and respect sovereign rights. The petition has garnered several hundred signatures and continues to circulate online.

Critics of the petition note that linking the World Cup to complex foreign policy issues could polarize fans and draw sport into debates better handled through diplomatic channels. Still, the movement resonates with broader European and Arctic voices worried about territorial sovereignty and geopolitical stability.

To sign the petition, click here.

Continue Reading

Global Update

Death Toll Rises to 39 After High-Speed Train Collision in Spain

Published

on

The death toll from a devastating collision involving two high-speed trains in southern Spain has risen to 39, with 152 people injured, according to Spain’s state broadcaster RTVE, citing police sources.

The crash occurred at approximately 7:45 p.m. local time on Sunday near Adamuz, in the province of Córdoba, about 360 kilometres south of Madrid. One of the trains reportedly derailed before colliding with an oncoming service, triggering a large-scale emergency response.

Major Disruptions to Rail Services

In the aftermath of the tragedy, rail travel across large parts of southern Spain has been severely disrupted. RTVE reported that more than 200 train services linking Madrid with the Andalucía region, including key routes to Córdoba, Seville and Granada, were cancelled throughout Monday as authorities worked to secure the rail network and assist with rescue and recovery efforts.

Government Response

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez cleared his schedule on Monday in response to the incident, according to an official statement from his office, underscoring the seriousness of the disaster and the government’s focus on the unfolding situation.

Rescue Efforts and Passenger Impact

Emergency teams worked through the night at the crash site. Video footage shared on social media showed rescuers assisting passengers from damaged carriages under powerful floodlights. Several passengers were treated and transported to hospitals in the region.

Authorities estimate that around 400 passengers were onboard the two trains at the time of the collision. Most were Spanish nationals travelling to or from Madrid after the weekend. It remains unclear how many foreign tourists may have been affected, as January is not peak tourist season in Spain.

Investigation Underway

Spain’s Transport Minister, Óscar Puente, said the cause of the crash is still unknown. Speaking at a press conference at Madrid’s Atocha Station on Sunday, he confirmed that a full investigation has been launched to determine what led to the collision and whether technical failure, human error or infrastructure issues played a role.

The incident marks one of Spain’s deadliest rail accidents in recent years, raising renewed questions about rail safety and emergency preparedness in one of Europe’s most extensive high-speed rail networks.

Continue Reading

Trending