Connect with us

Africa Watch

Trump Brings Congo and Rwanda Leaders to Washington in New Push Towards Peace

Published

on

Paul Kagame (L) and Felix Tshisekedi

U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday, December 4, 2025, hosted Rwandan President Paul Kagame and Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) President Felix Tshisekedi in Washington as his administration pressed for a breakthrough in one of Africa’s most volatile conflicts — even as fresh fighting continued in eastern Congo.

The two leaders reaffirmed an economic integration compact agreed last month and formally signed a U.S.-brokered peace deal first announced in June but never implemented.

Agreements, the Washington Accords for Peace and Security, covering critical minerals, security cooperation, and economic partnerships, were also signed.

For Washington, the meeting was part of a renewed diplomatic blitz as the Trump administration attempts to demonstrate global leadership. But for many in the region, the timing feels out of step with reality on the ground.

A Peace Deal While War Rages

Hours before the two presidents arrived in Washington, clashes erupted between Congo’s army and the M23 rebel group in South Kivu, according to Reuters, underscoring how far the region remains from lasting peace.

M23, widely believed to be backed by Rwanda — a claim Kigali denies — seized the two largest cities in eastern Congo earlier this year in an offensive that raised fears of a regional war.

In Washington, Congolese government spokesperson Patrick Muyaya blamed the latest violence on M23, calling it “proof that Rwanda doesn’t want peace.” The rebel group, which is not attending the U.S. talks and is not obliged to respect the agreement, accused Congolese troops of bombing civilian areas.

Both sides have repeatedly accused each other of violating ceasefires renewed just last month.

Diplomacy With High Stakes

The Trump administration argues that its push has helped stop the fighting from spiraling further. A senior U.S. official said the new signing “recommits the parties to the peace process” and follows months of pressure from President Trump, who told Kagame and Tshisekedi the “status quo was unacceptable.”

Still, analysts caution that the deal lacks mechanisms to address the conflict’s core drivers — from resource control to political grievances — and risks being overshadowed by the scramble for minerals central to global battery supply chains.

That view is shared by Dr. Denis Mukwege, the Congolese Nobel Peace Prize laureate known for his work with survivors of wartime sexual violence. Speaking from Paris, he questioned the sincerity of the process.

“For me, it is clear that this is not a peace agreement,” he said. “The proof: this morning, in my native village, people were burying the dead while a peace agreement was being signed. The M23 continues to seize territory.”

Symbolism in Washington

Ahead of Thursday’s meeting, Trump’s name was added to a sign outside the United States Institute of Peace, the government-created nonprofit where the deal is being signed. The move drew attention in Washington, as the administration earlier this year attempted to wrest control of the institute from its leadership.

For Trump — whose foreign policy record has drawn a mix of praise and criticism — the Congo-Rwanda summit adds to a list of high-profile interventions since returning to office. He has scored wins, including a deal in Gaza, but continues to face domestic pressure over inflation and cost-of-living concerns.

What Comes Next?

Whether Thursday’s agreements will shift dynamics in eastern Congo remains deeply uncertain. The peace deal still excludes M23, the main fighting force. The economic integration compact may help create long-term incentives for cooperation, but only if hostilities decrease.

For millions of civilians caught in the conflict, the signing ceremony in Washington offers little immediate relief. The humanitarian crisis — from displacement to reports of sexual violence — continues to worsen with each round of fighting.

The real test, regional observers note, will be whether Kagame and Tshisekedi can turn U.S. pressure into political will at home — and whether Washington’s push for stability aligns with the needs of a region where minerals, militias, and mistrust have fueled conflict for decades.

Africa Watch

Ghana Launches Month-Long Cultural Festival in Ethiopia to Strengthen Pan-African Ties

Published

on

Addis Ababa, Ethiopia – The Ghana Embassy in Ethiopia and Permanent Mission to the African Union and UNECA has officially launched “Ghana Month,” a major cultural and diplomatic initiative aimed at deepening ties between Ghana and Ethiopia while showcasing Ghana’s rich heritage across Africa.

The celebration, running throughout May 2026 at Kuriftu Village in partnership with Kuriftu Resorts, will feature cultural performances, creative exhibitions, music, fashion, culinary experiences, and entrepreneurial showcases. It is expected to attract diplomats, business leaders, tourists, and the Ethiopian public.

Counsellor Ms Grace Maakinyi Mbiba, in her opening remarks, described the initiative as “an opportunity to showcase the diversity of Ghana’s heritage and the dynamism of its creative and entrepreneurial sectors.”

Ambassador Dr Robert Afriyie commended Kuriftu Resorts for the collaboration, calling it a true embodiment of Pan-Africanism. He noted that the event aligns with Ghana’s broader vision of using tourism, culture, music, fashion, and history to promote continental unity and economic cooperation.

The Ambassador highlighted the growing bilateral relationship between Ghana and Ethiopia and positioned the month-long celebration as a practical platform to leverage the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) through cultural exchange and people-to-people connections.

The initiative is expected to boost tourism, trade, and mutual understanding between the two nations.

Continue Reading

Africa Watch

Botswana Acquires Stake in Angola’s Lobito Refinery in Major Intra-African Energy Deal

Published

on

Botswana is set to take up to a 30% stake in Angola’s $6 billion Lobito refinery, marking a significant intra-African investment.

The move reflects a growing push by African nations to retain more value from their resources on the continent.

The Lobito refinery, with a capacity of 200,000 barrels per day, is expected to generate around $700 million annually for Botswana under current assumptions. Instead of building new infrastructure from scratch, Botswana is buying into an existing facility to secure reliable fuel supply for Southern Africa, including itself, Zambia, and Namibia.

This deal reflects a broader strategic shift across Africa. For decades, many African countries have exported raw materials only to import refined products at much higher costs.

Investments like Botswana’s stake in Lobito signal a move toward greater regional refining capacity and supply chain control.

While the Lobito refinery will primarily serve Southern Africa, analysts note it could eventually compete with Nigeria’s Dangote Refinery, which currently dominates West Africa and exports to international markets.

The development is being watched closely as a potential model for deeper intra-African industrial cooperation and reduced dependence on external fuel imports.

Angola has signed a contract with China National Chemical Engineering Co. on Friday to build the $6 billion plant in Lobito.

“The processing capacities of the Lobito refinery remain at 200,000 barrels per day and the estimated cost of the investment is around $6 billion,” Diamantino Azevedo, the minister of Minerals and Petroleum, said in Luanda after a meeting between President Joao Lourenço and the company’s Chairman Wen Gang.

Sonangol, the southwest African nation’s state oil and gas group, partnered with an “American company” to conduct studies that led to decreased investment costs and improved refinery quality, Azevedo said, without naming the firm.

In 2022, Sonangol said it was working with Houston-based KBR Inc. on “engineering works” for the facility.

Continue Reading

Africa Watch

Pan Africanist Otchere-Darko Rebukes UK Conservative Leader Kemi Badenoch Over Recent Comment on Slavery Reparations

Published

on

Accra, Ghana / London, UK – Executive Chairman of the African Prosperity Network, Gabby Asare Otchere-Darko, has publicly rebuked UK Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch for her “disappointing” remarks opposing reparations for the transatlantic slave trade.

The borderless Africa champion has urged Badenoch, who has strong Nigerian roots, to use her position and heritage to foster constructive dialogue rather than defensiveness.

Otchere-Darko’s strong comments follow Badenoch’s criticism of the UK’s decision to abstain from a United Nations General Assembly vote on Ghana’s resolution declaring the transatlantic slave trade and racialised chattel enslavement of Africans as “the gravest crime against humanity.”

The resolution passed on March 25, 2026, with 123 nations voting in favour, three against (the United States, Argentina, and Israel), and 52 abstaining — including the United Kingdom.

In a post on X (formerly Twitter) on March 26, Badenoch expressed displeasure at the UK’s abstention under the Labour government, writing:

“Russia, China and Iran vote with others to demand trillions in reparations from UK taxpayers…and the Labour government abstain! Britain led the fight to end slavery. Why didn’t Starmer’s representative vote against this? Ignorance…or cowardice? We shouldn’t be paying for a crime we helped eradicate and still fight today.”

Otchere-Darko responded the following day, expressing disappointment and providing historical context.

He acknowledged Britain’s role in the eventual abolition of slavery — driven in part by Tory evangelical William Wilberforce — but noted that the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 was passed by a Whig government under Charles Grey, which compensated slave owners rather than the enslaved.

“Britain, which played a central role in the transatlantic slave trade, also saw the early campaign against it driven by Tory evangelicals like William Wilberforce in the early 1800s,” Otchere-Darko wrote. “But it took a Whig government… to pass the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833, ending slavery across most of the Empire while compensating slave owners, NOT THE ENSLAVED.”

He argued that Badenoch’s stance fails to acknowledge the enduring legal and moral arguments for reparatory justice and urged her to leverage her background as a woman of 100% Black West African parentage to help shape a more progressive and honest response.

“Kemi has an opportunity, given her heritage and position, to move this conversation forward: not by merely amplifying defensiveness, but by helping shape a modern response rooted in honesty and partnership,” he said. “It is in the interest of Britain to invest in Africa’s economic transformation efforts and even if in ways that support British economic interest.”

Otchere-Darko concluded by warning that such positions could make the Conservative Party less attractive to Britain’s growing Black middle class.

The UN resolution, championed by Ghana and supported by the African Union and CARICOM, calls for global acknowledgment of the slave trade’s scale and lasting impact, as well as concrete steps toward reparatory justice, including education, memorials, and dialogue on compensation and restitution.

Continue Reading

Trending