Connect with us

Commentary

NPP Decides: Comparing Dr Bawumia and Kennedy Agyapong Policies

Published

on

Voting is underway today (January 31, 2026) in the New Patriotic Party (NPP) presidential primary to elect the party’s flagbearer for the 2028 general elections. Over 200,000 delegates are participating across 276 constituencies and 333 polling stations nationwide.

Five candidates are contesting the race:

  1. Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia โ€“ Former Vice President of Ghana (widely seen as the establishment/technocratic candidate with a focus on digital economy, economic ideas, and continuity after leading the NPP in 2024).
  2. Kennedy Ohene Agyapong โ€“ Businessman and former MP for Assin Central (often positioned as the “street-smart,” anti-establishment voice touting practical solutions, creativity, and economic transformation; many polls and delegate sentiment have him as a strong frontrunner).
  3. Dr. Bryan Acheampong โ€“ MP for Abetifi and former Minister of Food and Agriculture (entrepreneur-politician with eight years as MP, focusing on agriculture and business-oriented policies).
  4. Dr. Yaw Osei Adutwum โ€“ Former Minister of Education and MP for Bosomtwe (known for education reforms and technocratic background).
  5. Kwabena Agyei Agyepong (also referred to as Ing. Kwabena Agyei Agyepong) โ€“ Former General Secretary of the NPP (experienced party insider with administrative and organizational strengths).

The primary is considered highly competitive, with a two-horse race dynamic often highlighted between Bawumia (data-driven, polished) and Agyapong (raw, experiential, street-fighter style). All candidates have publicly committed to accepting the results, and police have warned against any violence or intimidation at polling centers.

The winner will lead the NPP into the 2028 presidential election after the party’s loss in 2024.

Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia and Kennedy Ohene Agyapong are two leading candidates in the New Patriotic Party (NPP) presidential primary ongoing today, January 31, 2026.

While both seem to champion economic transformation and party unity, their approaches differ significantly. Bawumia’s policies are technocratic, data-driven, while Agyapong’s are driven by practical, business-oriented perspectives.

Below is a comparison across key policy areas based on their campaign messages, visions, and proposed initiatives.

Economic Policy and Management

  • Bawumia: As an economist and a former Vice President, Bawumia focuses on macroeconomic stability, fiscal discipline, and monetary policy to drive growth. He opposes “anti-poor” measures like the E-Levy and positions himself as a corrector of past government errors. His vision includes leveraging his experience in macro-economic management to address governance challenges and improve livelihoods through sound, evidence-based policies.
  • Agyapong: A businessman, Agyapong prioritizes practical economic solutions, criticizing theoretical approaches (“PhDs donโ€™t feed people”). He advocates for industrialization and job creation as core pillars, aiming to build a resilient economy through business-friendly reforms that generate employment and reduce reliance on imports.

Digitalization vs. Industrialization

  • Bawumia: Digital transformation is central to Bawumia’s agenda. He highlights achievements like the Ghana Card integration, mobile money interoperability, digitized public services (e.g., ports and passports), and online systems to enhance efficiency, reduce corruption, and promote transparency. He sees digitization as the foundation for modernizing Ghana’s economy and public sector.
  • Agyapong: While not opposing technology, Agyapong’s focus is on tangible industrialization to create jobs and drive manufacturing. He views this as essential for economic self-sufficiency, contrasting with what he sees as overly theoretical digital initiatives, emphasizing real-world impact on employment and production.

Party Unity and Internal Democracy

  • Bawumia: Bawumia promotes national unity by bridging north-south divides (increasing NPP support in northern regions), fostering Christian-Muslim relations, and appealing across age groups. He stresses maturity, humility, and policy-focused leadership to reduce political tensions and unite the party.
  • Agyapong: Unity and internal democracy are key to Agyapong’s leadership vision. He pledges to bring the NPP together if elected, anchoring his approach on inclusive party structures and grassroots engagement to strengthen democracy within the NPP and prepare for the 2028 elections.

Anti-Corruption and Governance

  • Bawumia: Leveraging his “untarnished integrity” from eight years in office, Bawumia proposes using technology (e.g., digitization) to fight corruption, enhance transparency, and build human capital. He aims to redefine governance through efficiency and accountability.
  • Agyapong: While specific anti-corruption policies are less detailed in campaigns, Agyapong’s business background implies a no-nonsense approach to governance, focusing on practical reforms to eliminate waste and promote efficiency in public service.

Overall Vision for Ghana

  • Bawumia: Bawumia’s vision is for a digitized, stable Ghana with enhanced education, grassroots politics, and national development. He positions himself as the experienced leader for continuity and correction, redefining roles like the vice presidency through innovation.
  • Agyapong: Agyapong envisions a united, industrialized Ghana with massive job creation. His “street-smart” style promises fresh energy, creativity, and change, defending the need for new leadership to revitalize the NPP and address economic challenges directly.

Both candidates commit to accepting results and maintaining party unity post-primary, but the election highlights a choice between Bawumia’s polished, tech-focused continuity and Agyapong’s gritty, job-oriented transformation.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Commentary

Reflections on Ghana And the Future it Deserves | By Simone Giger, Swiss Ambassador to Ghana

Published

on

As her diplomatic tenure in West Africa draws to a close, Swiss Ambassador Simone Giger pens a reflective and heartfelt tribute to Ghanaโ€™s enduring national character. Having traveled extensively across the countryโ€”from Paga to Keta and Wa to Goasoโ€”she offers an intimate, human-centered assessment of a nation defined by its resilient democratic culture, youthful ambition, and an infectious “vibe” that fosters cohesion. In this candid farewell, Ambassador Giger explores the complex challenges threatening Ghanaโ€™s ecological treasures and argues that sustained institutional reform, rather than outside invention, is the key to unlocking the prosperous future the country so clearly deserves.


Travelling through northern Ghana, this author once stopped in a small community after a long journey. Despite the dayโ€™s heat and the demands of daily life, residents welcomed visitors with warm smiles, easy laughter and an eagerness to share stories about their hopes for the future.

It was a simple encounter, yet it captured something profoundly Ghanaian: an enduring optimism that persists even in difficult circumstances.

In diplomacy, countries are often assessed through official meetings, economic indicators and policy documents. Yet to truly understand a nation, one must travel through it, listen to its people, appreciate its strengths, observe its contradictions and understand the aspirations that shape everyday life.

As the end of a diplomatic assignment in Ghana approaches, this author finds reason to reflect deeply on a country that has left a lasting impression, not only professionally but personally.

Over the past four years, extensive travels across Ghanaโ€”from Paga to Keta, Damongo to Donkokrom, and Wa to Goasoโ€”have revealed a country of extraordinary diversity, complexity, creativity and resilience.

Every journey has unveiled a different dimension of Ghana. Yet one common thread consistently emerges: a nation brimming with potential.

There is something profoundly remarkable about Ghana and its national character, what many Ghanaians simply describe as the countryโ€™s โ€œvibeโ€.

It is evident in the warmth extended to strangers, the humour with which difficulties are confronted and the optimism that endures even during periods of uncertainty.

Even in challenging moments, there is often a joke, a proverb or a story that helps place events in perspective.

In this authorโ€™s view, that national character has become one of the essential ingredients behind Ghanaโ€™s democratic success.

At a time when democratic systems around the world are facing increasing pressure, polarisation and distrust, Ghana continues to distinguish itself through its commitment to dialogue, constitutional order and peaceful coexistence.

Democracy here is not perfect. No democracy truly is, including Switzerlandโ€™s.

What matters is that it remains alive, active and deeply valued by citizens.

Over the years, Ghana has established itself as an important democratic reference point in West Africa.

The country has repeatedly demonstrated that political competition can coexist with stability, that transfers of power can occur peacefully and that national debates can take place within institutional frameworks rather than outside them.

Such achievements should never be taken for granted.

Democracy is not sustained by elections alone.

It requires strong institutions, active citizens, credible public discourse and a continuous willingness to negotiate consensus across political, ethnic, religious and generational lines.

One can observe that Ghanaโ€™s diversity presents both opportunities and challenges. Yet this author has often admired the manner in which the country continues to navigate these varied interests while preserving national cohesion.

In many respects, this is where Ghanaโ€™s democratic future becomes particularly important.

The country possesses extraordinary human capital.

Wherever this author travelled, young people displayed ambition, intelligence, creativity and determination.

Ghanaโ€™s greatest resource is not found beneath the ground.

It resides in its people, their ideas and their aspirations.

Ideas and aspirations, however, require systems that function effectively if they are to translate into meaningful and productive outcomes.

When institutions are transparent, responsive, accountable and trusted, they unlock innovation, investment and opportunity.

When they are weak or inconsistent, they risk frustrating the very energy capable of propelling a nation forward.

This is why governance reforms remain so important to Ghanaโ€™s long-term trajectory.

One development that particularly impressed this author during the diplomatic assignment has been Ghanaโ€™s constitutional review process.

What stands out is not only the process itself, but also the spirit behind it โ€“ a willingness to reflect critically on how democratic governance can evolve to meet contemporary realities and future expectations.

This demonstrates political maturity.

Constitutions should never be viewed as static documents frozen in time.

Strong democracies periodically examine whether their systems remain responsive, inclusive and effective.

Ghanaโ€™s consultative approach reflects a country seeking not merely to preserve democracy, but to improve it.

Switzerland is proud to support these home-grown efforts and remains committed to supporting the constitutional reform process until its hoped-for successful conclusion.

History demonstrates that democratic stability does not emerge automatically.

It requires deliberate investment in participation, inclusion and dialogue.

Swiss democracy itself evolved gradually through compromise, negotiation and the understanding that national cohesion is strengthened when citizens feel ownership over public decisions.

One can observe important similarities between Ghana and Switzerland.

Both countries are diverse societies that have chosen coexistence over division.

Both understand that stability is strongest when different voices are heard and accommodated.

Both appreciate the importance of consensus-building in national life.

This shared philosophy has shaped bilateral cooperation over many decades.

Today, the partnership continues to evolve in both breadth and depth.

Switzerland currently supports initiatives focused on democratic governance, parliamentary cooperation, decentralisation, peace and security, cultural exchange, environmental integrity, climate adaptation and economic development.

Switzerland and Ghana may differ in geography, history and scale, yet both countries share a belief in dialogue and cooperation as foundations for national progress.

Despite Ghanaโ€™s bright prospects, one cannot ignore the challenges confronting the country.

No nation can fully realise its potential without confronting difficult issues directly.

During the years spent in Ghana, citizens from various walks of life spoke openly about concerns surrounding institutional effectiveness, economic opportunity, environmental degradation and governance accountability.

Such conversations reflected not pessimism, but a desire to see the country fulfil its promise.

Particularly concerning is the destruction caused by illegal mining activities.

Ghanaโ€™s rivers, forests and landscapes are among its greatest treasures.

Environmental degradation is not merely an ecological issue.

It is fundamentally a matter of intergenerational responsibility.

Future prosperity depends on preserving the natural foundation upon which communities, livelihoods and national identity are built.

Yet despite these challenges, this author remains deeply optimistic about Ghanaโ€™s future.

That optimism stems not from idealism but from observation.

The future of democracy globally will not be shaped only by geopolitical actors or large states.

Medium-sized countries such as Switzerland and Ghana also have important roles to play.

They can demonstrate that democratic resilience, peaceful coexistence and institutional reform remain both possible and necessary.

As this diplomatic assignment draws to a close, there is profound gratitude for the opportunity to have lived and worked in Ghana.

Over the years, this author has come to admire the country not only for its democratic achievements, but also for its humanity โ€“ its warmth, creativity, humour and enduring sense of possibility.

The task ahead is not to invent Ghanaโ€™s future.

Rather, it is to create the institutional conditions necessary for that future to emerge fully.

From all that has been observed across the country, there is every reason to believe that Ghana can achieve precisely that.

The author, Simone Giger, is the Swiss Ambassador to Ghana, Togo and Benin

Continue Reading

Commentary

Authentic Voices, Foreign Narratives and the Fortune Madondo Case | By Joseph McCarthy

Published

on

This article by Joseph McCarthy, an analyst and researcher focusing on governance, security, and political transitions in the Sahel, argues that modern influence in Africa often spreads not through propaganda but through credible African voices that carry narratives aligned with the interests of external powers. Read the full article below.

Authentic Voices, Foreign Narratives and the Fortune Madondo Case

How Russian narratives are travelling through authentic African voices, and what the Fortune Madondo case reveals about it

By Joseph McCarthy

For years, the word disinformation conjured a familiar picture: troll farms, fake accounts and automated bots flooding the internet with crude propaganda. Those methods still exist, but influence operations have matured. The most effective messenger today is rarely an anonymous account. It is a real person, with a real name, a credible public profile and convictions he appears to hold sincerely.

The case of Fortune Madondo illustrates the shift. He is no online provocateur hiding behind a pseudonym; he is a Zimbabwean teacher and the founder of a youth organisation, with a documented life in his community. He writes under his own name, identified in his byline only as an “African Teacher,” with no institution given, and his views seem consistent with his stated beliefs. What matters is less who he is than what he carries. Across more than fifty articles in twelve months, most of them on Pan-African platforms, the line never wavers: praise for the military juntas of the Sahel, attacks on Western governments and on AFRICOM, condemnation of France’s role in Africa, and the celebration of resource sovereignty against foreign plunder. Whether by design or by conviction, these themes closely align with the narratives Moscow has sought to amplify across the continent.

That alignment, not the man, is the point. Influence no longer requires recruitment, payment or instruction. A foreign power’s objectives can be served just as well by people who believe every word they write, because the force of the message lies in its local authenticity. A reader will trust an African voice discussing African problems far sooner than a communiquรฉ from Moscow. So the useful question is not whether Fortune Madondo is a Russian agent; there is no public evidence that he is. The question is who benefits when local voices, sincere or not, repeatedly reinforce narratives that happen to serve a foreign strategy.

Consider how this interacts with Pan-Africanism. Russia has spent years presenting itself as a champion of African sovereignty and an enemy of colonialism, language that resonates because it draws on real historical wounds. Madondo’s writing sits comfortably within that tradition, and many African intellectuals share his instincts. Yet the scrutiny runs in only one direction. The West is relentlessly interrogated; Moscow, despite its expanding military, mining, and political footprint, is almost never asked the same questions. If Pan-Africanism is the defence of African sovereignty against all external control, the principle must apply evenly. When French deployments are called neo-colonial, Russian military contractors deserve the same examination; when Western extraction is condemned, so should Russian mining concessions. When he co-signed an appeal in late 2024 demanding both that Russian troops leave Ukraine and that French troops leave Africa, the false symmetry itself did Moscow’s work. A Pan-Africanism that suspects only one power risks sliding from a doctrine of independence into an instrument of another’s ambition.

The Madondo question also points to a place: Ghana. Over the past two years, the country has drawn growing attention from foreign actors keen to enter its media space, and the reason is structural. Ghana is one of Africa’s most respected democracies and a heavyweight in anglophone media; what is published in Accra travels across West Africa and beyond. In December 2025, Ghanaian journalists attended a SputnikPro seminar co-organised by the Russian Embassy and the Ghana-Russia Centre, led by Vasily Pushkov of Rossiya Segodnya, the state group behind the Sputnik news agency. Other moves followed, among them a cooperation agreement with Ghana’s main journalism university and the opening of a Russian cultural centre. None of this is illegal. But influence secured in Ghana enjoys a multiplier effect that few other markets offer.

The mechanism is quieter than propaganda and more durable. People do not trust propaganda; they trust outlets they already consider credible. A publication earns that trust through genuine local reporting, and the reader then assumes that everything on the page has cleared the same editorial bar. That is where credibility is transferred: from the newsroom’s real work to syndicated columns, opinion pieces and, on some platforms, verbatim Russian state material set at the same level as a story on local agriculture. Repetition completes the effect. Ten near-identical articles across ten outlets read as an independent consensus; the reader concludes that everyone is saying this, when in truth, the same viewpoint is simply circling back. Influence here comes not from proving a claim, but from normalising it.

The significance of the Madondo case, then, is not the unmasking of an operative; the evidence does not support that, and the chase would miss the point. It is the growing difficulty of telling sincere conviction apart from narratives engineered to serve someone else’s strategy, in an environment where influence travels through authentic voices, trusted platforms and ideas that genuinely resonate. The defence is not a hunt for enemies but the slower work of critical thinking, editorial transparency and media literacy. The question is no longer simply who is speaking. It is whose interests are served when the same narrative is amplified, again and again, across the continent.


Joseph McCarthy is an analyst and researcher focusing on governance, security, and political transitions in the Sahel. He writes on geopolitics, development, and African diplomacy. Email: joecarthy30@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Commentary

5 Reasons Ghanaโ€™s Floating Dock Could Reshape West Africaโ€™s Maritime Economy

Published

on

Ghana has inked a ยฃ215 million ( $287. 5 million) deal with the United Kingdom, anchored by a ยฃ101 million ($135.05 million) floating dock in Takoradi.

If successful, it will become the Gulf of Guineaโ€™s first modern, commercially operated ship repair facility.

Here is what is at stake.

1. The Gulf of Guinea Loses Millions While Ships Sail Elsewhere for Repairs

The Gulf of Guinea is one of Africaโ€™s busiest shipping corridors, crowded with oil tankers, cargo vessels, and offshore support ships. Yet almost all major repairs happen outside the region, often in Namibia, Spain, or beyond. Every vessel that bypasses West Africa carries away not just steel but also jobs, technical knowledge, and national revenue. The region pays the repair bill elsewhere and receives none of the associated economic ripple effects.

2. A Floating Dock Is Only the Beginning โ€“ The Real Prize Is a Maritime Services Cluster

The dock itself is just hardware. The true opportunity lies in building a complete ecosystem around it: logistics, steel fabrication, waste management, security, crew training, catering, and port-side supply chains. Without these supporting industries, the dock becomes an isolated asset rather than an engine of local employment.

3. Ghana Already Has Indigenous Firms Ready to Scale

Homegrown players such as Rigworld have proven capabilities in marine and industrial services. The pivotal question is whether this project allows those firms to grow or whether foreign operators will absorb the most valuable contracts. Local-content policies will determine the answer.

4. Success Depends on Transparent, Proactive Government Measures

Infrastructure alone guarantees nothing. Authorities must publish tender opportunities clearly and early, establish a centralized supplier portal, offer certification support to local businesses, and ensure that Ghanaian small and medium enterprises can access affordable working capital. Without deliberate rules, international firms may capture the entire supply chain while domestic companies watch from the shore.

5. If Ghana Succeeds, Takoradi Becomes a Blueprint for African Value Retention

Should Ghana get this right, the floating dock could become a template for how African economies retain more value from their own geographic advantages. If it fails, the region will simply have acquired another expensive piece of imported equipment with little local benefit. The Gulf of Guinea offers no shortage of ships. Whether Ghanaian businessesโ€”not just foreign firmsโ€”will profit from them remains the only question that truly matters.

Continue Reading

Trending