Connect with us

Africa Watch

March and March Leader Gunned Down: South African Police Face Mounting Pressure as Assassination Sparks Fear of Reprisals

Published

on

South African police are under mounting pressure to investigate the targeted killing of a senior March and March Movement leader, as the anti-immigration group vows to intensify its weekly protests despite a wave of death threats against its regional commanders.

Andile Mvuyelwa Somgxada, the movement’s Gauteng provincial leader, was shot while leaving his home in Greenfields, Ekurhuleni, on 4 July 2026. He was rushed to hospital, where he remained in critical care before succumbing to his injuries on 9 July.

National spokesperson Sandile Dube described Somgxada as “a dedicated and peace-loving patriotic South African” who remained committed to the movement’s campaign against undocumented migration. “He was rushed to hospital for medical treatment, where he fought for his life until the final hour on Thursday, July 9, 2026, when he was pronounced dead,” Dube said.

Wave of threats against regional leaders

The killing comes amid what the movement describes as a coordinated campaign of intimidation against its leadership structures across multiple provinces. According to Dube, the movement’s Tshwane regional leader received warning messages following a march held in Mamelodi on 9 July.

“Similar threats have also been received in Umlazi township in KwaZulu-Natal and in Mpumalanga province, all directed at March and March leaders,” Dube said.

The movement claims the threats originate from individuals who allegedly benefit from extortion, protection fees and other criminal enterprises linked to undocumented foreign nationals operating illegal businesses. These claims have not been independently verified.

“We call upon law enforcement authorities to get to the bottom of this matter, as it is bound to create unnecessary tension in various communities,” Dube said.

Movement vows to intensify protests

Despite the assassination and escalating threats, March and March has announced it will intensify its nationwide Thursday demonstrations, particularly in Gauteng Province, where it claims support for the campaign continues to grow.

The movement, which has become one of South Africa’s most visible anti-immigration groups over the past year, has organised demonstrations across several provinces calling for stronger immigration enforcement and action against undocumented foreign nationals.

“We call upon South Africans to stand up in defence of their country against drug cartels, extortionists disguised as security companies, drug dealers and human trafficking agents whose businesses are being disrupted by these continuous marches,” Dube said.

Immigration debate turns deadly

The assassination adds a volatile new dimension to South Africa’s increasingly polarising immigration debate. The March and March Movement, operating within a coalition of more than 20 anti-immigrant organisations, has mobilised nationwide demonstrations since setting a 30 June deadline for undocumented migrants to leave the country.

Those protests have repeatedly escalated into violence. At least two people were killed in Mossel Bay during anti-immigrant protests, while five people have died since protests began in April. Thousands of migrants, both documented and undocumented, have been driven from their homes, with businesses and property vandalised.

The Department of Home Affairs has intensified security raids, resulting in the arrest of thousands of undocumented migrants. More than 45,000 foreigners have reportedly left South Africa in recent months, returning to countries including Malawi, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Ghana and Nigeria.

Memorial and funeral arrangements

Dube confirmed that a memorial service for Somgxada is expected to be held in Gauteng later this week, while his funeral will take place in the Eastern Cape, subject to confirmation by his family.

“We call upon South Africans to honour the life of a fellow patriot and marcher, Mr Andile Mvuyelwa Somgxada, whose legacy will never be allowed to fade in vain,” Dube said.

Police under scrutiny

The South African Police Service (SAPS) has faced criticism over its handling of politically motivated violence, particularly following the establishment of specialised units in Gauteng to investigate political assassinations and organised crime. The killing of Somgxada is likely to test these mechanisms.

Police have not yet publicly commented on the investigation or confirmed whether any arrests have been made in connection with the assassination.

A nation on edge

With the movement vowing to continue its Thursday protests for four months leading up to municipal elections, and regional tensions already inflamed by the killing, South Africa faces an uncertain period. The government has maintained that immigration laws must be enforced within the framework of the Constitution and the rule of law, while condemning vigilantism.

But for the March and March Movement, the assassination of one of its own has only hardened its resolve. As Dube put it: “We will not be intimidated”.

Africa Watch

The West Africa Corridor’s Dirty Secret: Liberia’s Record Cocaine Bust Exposes State-Sanctioned Trafficking

Published

on

Two months ago, Liberian authorities made history. In a warehouse in Duazon, just outside the capital, they discovered nearly four metric tons of cocaine—an estimated $317 million street value—making it the largest drug bust in the nation’s history.

Days later, law enforcement agents publicly incinerated the haul alongside a smaller 237-kilogram seizure, sending a dramatic signal that Liberia was no longer “a place of comfort” for traffickers.

Yet, as the smoke cleared, a far more troubling reality emerged from the ashes. The investigation has moved deeper into Liberia’s security establishment, exposing a systemic rot that challenges the very narrative of a state successfully waging war on drugs. As Police Inspector General Gregory O.W. Coleman told a government press briefing: the Duazon operation was “definitely sanctioned by state actors at the very, very senior level” of government.

A Political Bombshell

The gravity of the scandal reached its peak on August 19, when authorities charged former Vice President Jewel Howard-Taylor—who served from 2018 to 2024—with drug trafficking, money laundering, criminal solicitation, and conspiracy. She was stopped at Roberts International Airport while attempting to leave for Ghana and taken into custody.

Justice Minister Oswald Tweh’s statement was emphatic: “There will be no selective justice, political protection, sacred cows or compromise with organized criminality.”

Yet Howard-Taylor’s office has vehemently denied the charges, framing the case as a “politically motivated witch-hunt and an abuse of state power,” and alleging that unnamed government figures may use artificial intelligence to fabricate evidence against her.

The Pipeline Within

While the former Vice President’s arrest captured global headlines, the investigation has also pulled back the curtain on a disturbing institutional problem. Senior police officers were allegedly not just passive bystanders but active facilitators. Coleman named the chief of highway patrol and the head of major crimes as having driven escort for the massive drug consignment, using police vehicles to move it from the shoreline to the stash house.

“We have identified key state actors who played a role in transporting, escorting the movement of these narcotic substance from the landing site to the holding ground using police vehicles as escort, one in the front, one in the back,” Coleman said.

A deputy commander at the airport was also identified as a key actor.

President Joseph Boakai has responded with sweeping administrative action, dismissing senior officials from airport security, the Liberia National Police, the National Security Agency, and the Liberia Drug Enforcement Agency. A deputy commissioner was dismissed after reportedly admitting to accepting a $10,000 bribe.

The Vanishing Suspects

Despite these actions, a troubling question remains unanswered: who is actually being held accountable?

The two foreign nationals arrested at the scene—a Serbian and a dual Colombian-Spanish citizen—have become the most visible faces of the investigation. Meanwhile, more than a dozen Liberian suspects named in writs of arrest have largely disappeared from public view, with little visible movement toward trial.

As one FrontPageAfrica analysis noted, “For the public, the answers remain unclear. The result is a widening perception that while the two foreign nationals are being visibly prosecuted, several Liberian suspects have effectively vanished from the case.”

This perception is particularly damaging given Coleman’s admission. If the country’s top police officer says senior state actors were involved, why does the visible face of justice remain largely two foreign nationals?

A Regional Crisis

Liberia’s situation is not an isolated incident but a glaring example of a wider continental problem. According to the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime, at least 30% of cocaine destined for European markets now passes through West Africa. The region has become a critical transit corridor, with smugglers exploiting porous borders and weak enforcement.

The report notes that large shipments of cocaine are supported by “protection systems provided by politicians, security officials, and armed groups,” where territorial control and access to institutional cover make trafficking possible.”

This dynamic extends across the region, with Sierra Leone recently identified as a strategic hub for a route that saw a record 30-tonne seizure by Spanish authorities.

A Defining Moment

For Liberia, this scandal represents a critical test of institutional integrity. Anti-corruption group CENTAL has warned that dismissals alone are insufficient. “Narcotics of such quantity do not transit a country whose borders, seaports, and airports are functioning without compromises and collusive networks. This is a governance failure before it is a criminal one,” said CENTAL Executive Director Anderson Miamen.

The government has secured international support, with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration now working in-country alongside Liberian investigators.

However, the lingering questions about who orchestrated the operation and who remains protected will likely determine whether these actions are remembered as a decisive turning point or merely another episode in Liberia’s long struggle against organized crime.

Continue Reading

Africa Watch

Liberia Agrees to Accept Up to 1,200 US Deportees Under Trump Migration Deal

Published

on

Liberia has agreed to accept as many as 1,200 people deported from the United States, in one of the largest known arrangements between the Trump administration and an African country under its intensified immigration enforcement policy.

Liberian Information Minister Jerolinmek Piah announced the agreement Tuesday in Monrovia, saying the deportees will arrive over the course of a year. The first group, consisting of 20 people, is expected to arrive Thursday.

According to reports by AfricaNews, the agreement allows the United States to send people to Liberia who are not necessarily Liberian citizens.

“Those to be transferred from the United States of America to Liberia will include citizens or nationals of African and Western hemisphere countries who are medically authorized to travel,” Piah told reporters.

The arrangement represents a significant expansion of a Trump administration strategy that has sought to remove migrants from the United States even when their destination is not their country of origin.

Deportees may be from other countries

Under the agreement, Liberia could receive deportees from other African nations as well as countries in the Western Hemisphere.

The development is part of a broader U.S. effort to establish agreements with countries willing to receive migrants who have been ordered removed from the United States.

The Trump administration has reached similar arrangements with several African countries, with advocates raising concerns about the circumstances surrounding some deportations.

A particularly contentious issue involves migrants whose removal to their home countries has been blocked by U.S. immigration judges because they could face danger or persecution if returned.

Piah did not say whether any of the people expected to be transferred to Liberia have such protection orders.

Liberia says deportees can seek asylum

The Liberian government said those arriving under the arrangement will have options once they are in the country.

According to Piah, deportees may seek asylum in Liberia after their arrival.

He also said they would be free to leave Liberia whenever they choose.

Liberia will receive assistance from the United States to help manage the deportation program and strengthen the country’s migration system, Piah said.

The agreement therefore goes beyond simply accepting deportees. It will also involve U.S. support for Liberia’s ability to manage migrants and asylum seekers.

Part of Trump’s broader immigration crackdown

The agreement comes as the Trump administration continues its aggressive campaign to increase deportations and deter illegal immigration.

The administration has pursued agreements with countries willing to accept deportees who cannot or will not be returned directly to their countries of nationality.

Advocates have criticized the practice, particularly where deportations involve people who have sought protection in the United States or whose return to their home countries has been deemed unsafe.

The use of third countries can also create questions about what legal protections deportees will have after they arrive and whether they have meaningful opportunities to challenge their removal.

Liberian officials have not indicated that all 1,200 potential deportees have been identified, nor have they provided details about their nationalities, immigration histories or individual circumstances.

For now, the first test of the agreement is expected Thursday, when the initial group of 20 deportees is due to arrive in Monrovia.

The arrangement could ultimately make Liberia one of the most significant African destinations for people removed from the United States under the Trump administration’s evolving migration policy.

Continue Reading

Africa Watch

Beyond the Music: Maxwell’s South Africa Cancellation Sparks Conversation About Celebrity Image

Published

on

By

Sometimes the biggest fashion story is about the outfit that never makes it onto the stage.

The cancellation of Maxwell’s highly anticipated South African concerts has left thousands of fans disappointed, but it has also sparked a different conversation about the lasting influence of celebrity image.

The Grammy-winning R&B icon was due to perform at Pretoria’s SunBet Arena on 8 August and Cape Town’s Grand Arena, GrandWest on 11 August before announcing that “unforeseen circumstances beyond my control” had forced him to cancel both appearances.

Promoters later confirmed that Maxwell would not be travelling to South Africa at any point in 2026, with hopes now pinned on rescheduled dates in 2027.

For an artist like Maxwell, a concert has always been about more than the music. His carefully cultivated aesthetic—sharp tailoring, luxurious fabrics, understated jewellery and his unmistakable natural hair—has become inseparable from his artistic identity.

Long before “quiet luxury” became a fashion buzzword, Maxwell embodied refined elegance that never relied on excess. His wardrobe has consistently reflected the same qualities found in his music: confidence, restraint and timeless sophistication.

That visual identity helps explain why the cancelled performances feel like a cultural loss beyond the concert calendar.

Fans were preparing not only to hear classics performed live but also to witness an artist whose presence has shaped men’s style across generations.

His look has influenced performers, stylists and fashion-conscious audiences who appreciate clothing that speaks through craftsmanship rather than spectacle.

Online speculation has attempted to explain the cancellation, with some social media users questioning whether recent concerns about xenophobic tensions in South Africa played a role.

There is, however, no evidence supporting that claim, and neither Maxwell nor the event promoters have linked the decision to safety concerns. Until an official explanation emerges, the reason remains unknown.

What remains certain is that Maxwell’s influence extends beyond the stage. Even in his absence, his personal brand continues to remind the entertainment industry that true style is not measured by appearances alone, but by the lasting impression an artist leaves wherever their name is announced.

Continue Reading

Trending