Connect with us

Global Update

What Happens Next After Keir Starmer’s Resignation? A Timeline for Britain’s New PM

Published

on

Sir Keir Starmer has announced he will step down as Britain’s Prime Minister, triggering a Labour Party leadership contest that could see a new leader in place by September – or potentially much sooner.

The Prime Minister’s resignation, delivered at a media conference on Monday, June 22, 2026, sets in motion a carefully choreographed process governed by Labour Party rules. While Starmer will remain in office during the transition, the coming weeks will determine who succeeds him at 10 Downing Street.

Here is what happens next, step by step, according to ABC’s Chief Elections and Data Analyst Casey Briggs and former Europe correspondent Barbara Miller.

1. Starmer stays until September – but not necessarily

Starmer has confirmed he will not step down immediately. He is expected to remain as Prime Minister until a successor is chosen, with the transition period stretching potentially into September.

“He’s probably going to stay there until September, but there will be a contest now for the new leader. And while they sort that out, he will remain there as PM,” Briggs explained.

However, Briggs clarified that the September date is not fixed; it applies only if a contested ballot is required.

2. Nominations open on 9 July, after the NATO summit

Starmer has indicated he will ask the executive committee of the Labour Party to open nominations on 9 July 2026.

That date is strategically chosen: it falls the day after the NATO summit in Turkey, which Starmer is expected to attend. His final international appearance as PM will therefore be on the world stage alongside other allied leaders.

3. Nominations close by 23 July (summer recess)

Once nominations open, candidates will have a narrow window to secure support. Starmer has said he will ask for nominations to be closed by the time of Parliament’s summer recess.

According to Briggs, that date is 23 July 2026 – though he noted it is not a fixed statutory date but the likely parliamentary timetable.

“Somewhere between the 9th and 23rd of July, we’ll expect nominations to be closed,” Briggs said.

4. A candidate needs 81 MP signatures to get on the ballot

To become a leadership contender, a Labour MP must secure 81 signatures from fellow Labour MPs – a significant threshold that effectively limits the field to candidates with substantial parliamentary backing.

Briggs highlighted this as a crucial gatekeeping mechanism:

“To get on the ballot, an MP needs 81 signatures of their fellow MPs to get on the ballot.”

5. If only one candidate emerges – new PM by mid-to-late July

If only one candidate secures the required 81 nominations, there will be no contest. That candidate will automatically become Labour Party leader and can be sworn in as Prime Minister without a membership ballot.

“If there is only one candidate at that point, that person will take over and become leader of the Labour Party and can be sworn in,” Briggs confirmed.

In that scenario, Britain could have a new Prime Minister by mid-to-late July – well before the summer recess ends.

6. If multiple candidates stand – ballot runs to late August

If two or more candidates qualify, the contest will go to a ballot of all Labour Party members. That process will take several weeks, with voting likely running through August.

“If there is more than one candidate, then that will go to a ballot of Labour Party members and that will take through to potentially late August,” Briggs said.

7. New PM in place by 1 September – when Parliament returns

The ultimate deadline is the resumption of Parliament in September. Briggs noted that the new leader – whether chosen by acclamation or by membership ballot – is expected to be in office by the time of the September sittings, which begin on 1 September.

“The new PM can be in office by the time of the September sittings, which is September 1,” he said.

Who is in the running? Andy Burnham vs Wes Streeting

All indications point to Andy Burnham, the Mayor of Greater Manchester, as the clear frontrunner. Briggs observed that Burnham is “hugely popular” within the Labour Party, and there is palpable excitement about his potential return to Westminster.

But he may not be unopposed.

Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary and a prominent Starmerite, is still considering whether to stand. Barbara Miller suggested Streeting might opt for a deal with Burnham rather than a divisive contest.

“There is a suggestion that he might be considering whether it would be better not to stand and to perhaps do some kind of deal with Andy Burnham where he gets a good position in Burnham’s cabinet,” Miller said.

Other potential contenders mentioned include Angela Rayner, the former Deputy Prime Minister, and Al Carnes, a junior defence minister who resigned recently.

Miller noted that while Starmerite candidates could theoretically run as a “surrogate” to continue Starmer’s legacy, “the names are not particularly prominent.”

What to watch

The key dates to watch are 9 July (nominations open), 23 July (nominations close), and 1 September (Parliament returns). If Burnham secures the required 81 signatures and no other candidate qualifies, Britain could have a new Prime Minister within weeks. If Streeting or others enter the race, the contest will stretch into late August – with Labour members deciding the country’s next leader.

Global Update

Wave of Student Killings at Mexico Universities Raises Safety Concerns

Published

on

Two female students at the Autonomous University of Morelos disappeared within days of each other in March. Both were later found dead. Since April of last year, at least seven students from the same university have been murdered, five young women and two teenage boys.

Among them was an exchange student from Spain, killed last month just weeks after arriving in Mexico.

“When we hear that another student has disappeared or been killed, we all see ourselves in her. We think, that could have been me,” said Yugi Milan, a student activist in Morelos, speaking to The World’s Tibisay Cea and colleague Axel Hernandez.

The killings have exposed a deepening crisis of gender-based violence at Mexican universities, and a system that activists say is failing to protect students, investigate complaints, or deliver justice.

A University Under Pressure

The Autonomous University of Morelos responded to the high-profile murders with calls for investigation and promises of tighter security: more guards, cameras, and panic buttons.

But activists say those measures do not address the root of the problem, sexual harassment on campus.

“They can’t even respond to complaints of gender violence against professors and fellow students on campus,” Milan said, speaking in Spanish.

The problem extends far beyond Morelos. A recent study found that nearly one in five female university students in Mexico has experienced sexual harassment — but only about 10 percent file a formal complaint.

Fear of Retaliation

Ana Buquet, a gender studies researcher at Mexico’s largest public university, UNAM, says fear keeps victims silent.

“I think basically they are afraid,” Buquet said. “First, many times they feel alone.”

Victims fear retaliation from professors, including lower grades or obstacles to graduating, she said.

Ameyali Ramirez, a UNAM student, remembers a teaching assistant who had been accused of harassing female students — yet continued working with them. Ramirez says she had to take exams alone with him, behind a closed door. Nothing happened to her, but she questions why the exams were conducted that way.

While Ramirez acknowledges universities have made progress, including better reporting procedures and courses on gender violence, Buquet says many reforms focus on responding to harassment rather than preventing it. Universities need more education on gender equality and better training for professors and staff, she said.

Danger Beyond Campus Gates

For many students, the threat follows them home.

Lorena Ruiz Rojas, a 19-year-old anthropology student at UNAM, says she worries about disappearing during her commute. She regularly shares her live location with her family on WhatsApp.

Mexico has a widespread disappearance crisis, with more than 130,000 people officially listed as missing. Security analyst Eduardo Guerrero says organized crime is behind many disappearances involving young women and girls.

“Many times it is young women who disappear, and it has to do with human trafficking markets, sexual trafficking,” Guerrero said.

Some criminal groups abduct young women for sexual exploitation, he said.

Harassment Is Everywhere

Even in everyday life, women in Mexico face harassment in public spaces.

In Mexico City, the subway reserves some cars for women and young children only. Carmen Cuevas, waiting for the next train with her five-year-old son, says the measure exists for safety reasons, she says men have touched her when traveling in mixed-gender cars.

Another passenger, 64-year-old Patricia Ponce de León, says harassment does not stop as women grow older. She has seen men masturbating in front of her on the train.

Justice Denied

For women who report abuse, getting justice can be another ordeal.

Becky Bios is a survivor of domestic violence. Her former husband beat her to the point of deforming her face and causing internal injuries — just because she wanted to leave the relationship. She was hospitalized in critical condition for several days and was afraid to report him.

When she finally filed a formal complaint nine years ago, she says the case never led to prosecution. Her aggressor remains free.

Mexico has one of the highest rates of femicides in the world. According to the National Statistics Agency, more than 93 percent of crimes are either never reported or never investigated.

A Regional Reckoning

The report comes amid renewed global attention to campus sexual violence, following recent gang rape allegations at Cornell University in the United States. In Mexico, students have spent years demanding better protection from sexual harassment and gender-based violence, and say the urgency has never been greater.

For students in Morelos and across Mexico, the fear is personal and constant.

“When we hear that another student has disappeared or been killed, we all see ourselves in her,” Milan said. “We think, that could have been me.”

Continue Reading

Global Update

Space Wars: New NOVA Documentary Warns Militarization of Orbit Could Spark Next Global Conflict

Published

on

Astrophysicist Jonathan McDowell says the world’s 12,000 satellites are now indispensable, and increasingly vulnerable, as anti-satellite weapons, space jammers and a rising tide of orbital debris threaten the systems that run modern life

A new PBS documentary is sounding the alarm about the growing militarization of space, warning that the satellites underpinning everything from cell phone connections and GPS to ATMs and battlefield communications have become both indispensable assets and prime targets in a new era of potential conflict.

The NOVA film Space Wars, featuring astrophysicist Jonathan McDowell, explores how the roughly 12,000 satellites now in orbit have become central to modern military operations — and why a war in space could have consequences lasting decades to centuries.

“Without them, commanders are blind,” the documentary notes, describing how satellites are essential for battlefield communication, surveillance, intelligence and targeting. “The more sophisticated these space-based systems, the greater edge they provide. And the more valuable targets they become.”

McDowell, who retired from the Smithsonian Observatory earlier this year, told The World that militaries are now as dependent on satellites as civilian society.

“As much of the world is, the satellites network us. They feed us information. They connect us,” he said. “For the military, a lot of communications across the world goes across satellites. Surveillance, of course. Intelligence, what are your opponents up to? And navigation. GPS was developed originally for weapons guidance. All of those things are absolutely integral to the way that a modern military operates.”

Anti-Satellite Weapons and the Debris Threat

Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine saw Moscow jam satellites over the country, but McDowell warned that countries possess far more destructive capabilities — including kinetic anti-satellite weapons designed to physically strike orbiting spacecraft.

“It doesn’t need any explosive on board because the satellite’s traveling at 17,000 miles an hour,” he said. “If you can just get in the way of it, it’s going to completely smash. And that would generate enormous amounts of space debris and space junk that would be very bad for everyone using space.”

Space debris is already a mounting hazard. McDowell said more than 30,000 pieces a few inches across or larger are being tracked, while centimeter-sized debris could number as much as a million pieces in orbit.

“We’ve been seeing a concerning increase in the number of small incidents,” he said, citing a recent strike on China’s space station that hit an evacuation module, though no lives were lost. “The worry is that that’s a rising level that indicates that the bigger pieces of space debris are not far behind and that we could start losing satellites soon. I think it’s a real problem and a real risk.”

The documentary features Paul Graziani, CEO of the aerospace company Comsbox, who describes how space junk ranges from spent rocket stages and defunct satellites to lost astronaut gloves and errant screws.

Space Jammers: The Next Front

Rather than destroying satellites outright, which would create debris harmful to all space users, McDowell said major powers are increasingly turning to “space jammers” that can drown out satellite signals with competing radio frequencies.

“You can put a satellite next to the GPS satellite and broadcast really loud so as to disable it for all users, or maybe even to take out the satellite if you can drown out its control frequencies,” he said. “These space jammer weapons, I think, are likely to be the focus in the years to come.” He noted rumors that the United States has already deployed such systems.

A Militarized History, and a Fragile Peace

The idea of militarizing space is not new, McDowell said, it predates the first satellite launch.

“In the 1940s, before we even launched the first satellite, space has been militarized, I’m afraid, since the very earliest days.” Within a couple of years of Sputnik, the CIA was launching spy satellites, and the first space weapons test came in 1959.

“We’ve managed to stay just on the right side of peace in space, but there’s been a strong military thread throughout the history of space exploration,” he said.

Asked whether the world is in an arms race in space, McDowell said the dynamic is broader:

“Not just an arms race, but also a military support race, a spy satellite race, a navigation satellite race, a communication satellite race, to support the militaries operating on Earth by more and more sophisticated space assets, giving them an edge over their opponents. Along with that, there has been the development of actual space weapons, but not their deployment, not their use.”

He attributed the restraint to political incentives and the severity of escalation:

“It would be such an act of war to destroy someone else’s satellite. It would be seen as a real escalation. No one actually wants to start a war in space. But if a war does break out, then it will spread to space. That’s what’s different now.”

Treaties and the Case for a New Agreement

The 1967 Outer Space Treaty prohibits nuclear weapons in space, but no comparable agreements bar conventional warfare in orbit. McDowell argued a new accord is necessary because 21st-century society depends so heavily on space technology.

“If you have a war that spreads to space, then you start losing all of that high-tech capability,” he said. “And if you really have a real war in space with debris generation and so on, then you lose the use of space for decades to centuries because of all the debris whizzing around.”

Despite the risks, McDowell said it is not too late to change course, and that the United States and China, the main players in space, hold the key.

“I worry about it because I feel like there’s still time to change direction here,” he said. “A decision to switch the rhetoric around and actually more seriously work towards: how do we trust each other? How do we verify that we’re not about to attack each other? — rather than all of the ranting going on right now about how we need to be able to kick the other guy’s butt in space. Then I think you could still stave this off.”

Space Wars is available to stream now on YouTube, produced by NOVA.

Continue Reading

Global Update

Tragedy As Three Children Found Dead in Vehicle Boot in Ghana

Published

on

Police in Ghana’s Northern Region have launched a murder investigation into the deaths of three young children whose bodies were discovered in the boot of a vehicle at the Koblimahagu Zoo in the Tamale Metropolis, after a preliminary autopsy indicated they did not die of natural causes.

The children, Dauda Abdul Aziz, 3; Saani Alsharaf, 5; and Dauda Fadilan, 7, were found dead on Monday morning, Oct. 5, in a black Hyundai Tucson with registration number AS 1770-14.

They had reportedly left home on Sunday to attend Islamic classes but never returned.

According to reports, preliminary autopsy findings suggest the children may have been murdered. However, a toxicological examination is still required to establish the full circumstances and possible cause of death.

“The autopsy revealed they did not die a natural death,” a source familiar with the investigation told Joy News. “There is a need for toxicological examination to be conducted to fully establish the facts.”

Vehicle Owner Arrested

The owner of the vehicle, a member of the Ghana Immigration Service, has been arrested and transported to Accra to assist with investigations. The officer reportedly told police that the vehicle had been stuck in mud for five days.

Police said the vehicle was found stuck in mud, with the driver’s door and rear passenger door open, while the boot and other doors were locked. The vehicle has been secured for further forensic examination as investigators work to determine how the children ended up inside the boot.

National Response

The Inspector-General of Police has deployed forensic and crime scene experts to Tamale to support the investigation. Homicide investigators and intelligence officers have also been dispatched to assist the Northern Regional Police Command.

The teams are expected to examine the vehicle and other evidence at the scene as investigators work to establish the circumstances surrounding the children’s deaths.

The case has generated widespread concern in the Northern Region, where residents are calling for a thorough and transparent investigation.

Key Facts

  • Location: Koblimahagu Zoo, Tamale Metropolis, Northern Region, Ghana
  • Victims: Dauda Abdul Aziz (3), Saani Alsharaf (5), Dauda Fadilan (7)
  • Discovery: Bodies found in the boot of a black Hyundai Tucson on Monday morning
  • Suspect: Vehicle owner, a Ghana Immigration Service officer, arrested and transported to Accra
  • Official Status: Murder investigation opened; toxicology results pending
  • Response: Inspector-General of Police deployed forensic and crime scene experts to Tamale

Continue Reading

Trending